The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
in general, lightweight and heavyweight grow similar amounts of muscle, but you have to reach a certain amount of reps. The consensus is about five or six. So say it's six, you have to do at least six reps, but it could be all the way up to 30 they grow the same amount of muscle.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
But in general, lightweight and heavyweight grow similar amounts of muscle, but you have to reach a certain amount of reps.
But generally you could do if you like doing low reps, you could do sets of six and grow just fine. And if you love higher reps, you could do sets of 20 to 30 and grow just fine.
the data are that you know it the number of reps you do for hypertrophy and strength don't especially for hypertrophy don't really matter provided