The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I showed them a monster walk. Okay, monster walk. Now, we're going to the bottom of the hill, and I want you to lean back into the hill, and we're walking backwards. You're going to align your foot, ankle, knee, and hip, and push through the knee, through the knee, through the knee, backwards, up the hill. Do you know after 30 m, they were absolutely done. Here they are doing all this deadlifting and they don't even have the leg strength endurance to walk backwards 30 meters.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
I showed them a monster walk. Okay, monster walk. Now, we're going to the bottom of the hill and I want you to lean back into the hill and we're walking backwards. You're going to align your foot, ankle, knee, and hip and push through the knee, through the knee, through the knee, backwards up the hill.