Bryan Johnson· Author
You might think that muscles are important for longevity but actually strength is the real predictor of lifespan.
Loading…
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
You might think that muscles are important for longevity but actually strength is the real predictor of lifespan.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
and they found that uh strength was actually a better predictor than muscle mass
strength was actually a better predictor than muscle mass
turns out by the way that strength matters more than muscle mass but muscle mass is a very good proxy for strength
and by the way strength is even slightly higher court
um and they found that uh strength was actually a better predictor than muscle mass um