The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
when you break people down into quartiles or quintiles of fitness and strength the biggest jump in uh the benefit right so the biggest Improvement in mortality always comes from being in the bottom quintile or cortile to the Next One
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
being weak relative to being strong is about 250%
Being weak relative to being strong is about 250%.