Peter Attia· MD
I would Target um the wide back midback so we're looking at our our lats um to get the lat the width of the back and that can help um I guess from an aesthetic perspective to create the illusion of a really small waste
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I would Target um the wide back midback so we're looking at our our lats um to get the lat the width of the back and that can help um I guess from an aesthetic perspective to create the illusion of a really small waste
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
um the wide back midback so we're looking at our our lats um to get the lat the width of the back and that can help um I guess from an aesthetic perspective to create the illusion of a really small waste so a wide group pull Downs wide grip pullups