The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
the other curve that's sort of perpendicular to this is dealing with the fact that sometimes stress is a great thing. Um, like our goal is not to cure people of stress. Um, because if it's the right kind, we love it. We we pay good money to be stressed that way by a scary movie or roller coaster ride.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
that means we don't hate stress we hate the wrong amount of stress when it's the right amount we love it we pay money to be stressed to get on a roller coaster to go to a scary movie when it's the right amount when it's the optimal amount and we call it stimulation
there's the added factor that there's incredible individual variation as to what counts is the optimal level in between and one person's like hair-raising Audubon Society walk one Saturday morning looking for birds while the other person goes and signs up to be a mercenary in Yemen because that's when they feel alive and awake and all of that not only that it's a narrow range but we differ so much as to what each person's optimum is