The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
it's much less common um than uh a stroke involving the brain um probably because there's less tissue involved uh the spinal cord is supplied by um an anterior spinal artery that's an artery on on on this side and by two so for those listening sorry it would be the um sorry on the stomach side of of the body yeah and it's supplied by two arteries posterior spinal on the back side
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.