Andrew Huberman· PhD
so if there's an interruption to blood flow in any of those arteries it can cause death of tissue in the spinal cord and that would result in a neurologic deficit depending on where it is
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so if there's an interruption to blood flow in any of those arteries it can cause death of tissue in the spinal cord and that would result in a neurologic deficit depending on where it is
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.