The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
quote these low quantities are likely attainable through raw broccoli or cruciferous vegetable products so that's great what this means is that you don't need to supplement with sulphoraphane if you're willing to eat raw broccoli they're specifically saying raw broccoli or other cruciferous vegetable products
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
We talked about how there's a good chance that isothiocyanates, a group of compounds that notably include sulfurophane are likely what's driving these associations.
If we extrapolate that to a human equivalent dose, it comes out to around 20 gram of sulforophane a day, which is an amount you might expect to find in around 43 gram of fresh broccoli sprouts.
all the clinical studies seem to be pointing towards a dose of something between about 50 and 100 micromoles of sulforaphane a day