We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
I think it has to do with scientific reductionism and what I mean to say by that is we've had a lot of data that shows that ultraviolet lights can cause cancer and so we've assumed that anything that has ultraviolet light can cause cancer there's this complete dismissal of the fact that this ultraviolet light is packaged for the entire existence of human nature along with infrared lights
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.