Peter Attia· MD
I tell my patients they have to use mineral sunscreens as opposed to chemical sunscreens because I'm not convinced of the safety of aobenzone, oxyenzone as hormone disruptors.
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I tell my patients they have to use mineral sunscreens as opposed to chemical sunscreens because I'm not convinced of the safety of aobenzone, oxyenzone as hormone disruptors.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
You can measure them in the bloodstream, especially if you're putting them over the entire body.
You can measure them in the bloodstream especially if you're putting them over the entire body. the body, the skin is a great portal for chemicals to enter into the bloodstream if it's the right size chemical. So there have been already studies done that show a huge spike in the amount of these in your bloodstream after application.