The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the EFSA's concern of potential DNA-damaging effects of tongkat ali were seen at a dose of 2,000 mg/kg bodyweight in unpublished rodent data. If my allometric scaling math is correct, this is about 10x the human dose showing positive effects.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
Making the rodent data on toxicity more of a study of what no humans actually takes.