The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I have patients and if they're at the end of their rope and we are having a lot of trouble controlling their vision loss from glaucoma I'm already recommending in these limited cases uh hey why don't you try this it's almost certainly safe uh and it may and it may help and it may help protect your vision over time
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
in both of those trials high do vitamin B3 was a found to be very safe and B was shown to actually improve at least in the short term improve retinal function measured either on visual field testing or on uh the electroretinogram