The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
both pharmaceuticals from Cynthia synthetic sources and from plants are going to have side effects on the first podcast with with Ben we talked about the collateral damage which is essentially the same thing I'm talking about here the fact that plant molecules have collateral damage
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the fact that plant molecules have collateral damage
i think that plant molecules when we use them as medicine are the same as pharmaceutical molecules in the sense that they are going to have some effects that we want and some effects that we don't want and we need to be very careful of this because they're powerful molecules
with a lot of these plant molecules there are also side effects they're you know they're probably a little more mild but there are side effects to plant molecules we know this