The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so I do view supplements I think through the appropriate lens which is that they are indeed a supplement they are not necessary many of them are simply sufficient to serve as an insurance policy or to augment mental and physical health maybe longevity uh in ways that make it worthwhile given my disposable income that I want to devote to supplements but I don't think you need them
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.