The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
And according to the female sexual function index questionnaire, no significant difference between any of the groups, however free and bio-available testosterone increased in the group taking Tribulus Terrestris, total testosterone did not reach statistical significance.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
This particular study was focused on females. Um and according to the female sexual function index questionnaire um no significant difference between any of the groups. However, free and bioavailable testosterone increased in the group taking tribulus terrestus. Total testosterone did not reach statistical significance.