Andrew Huberman· PhD
And also agree that if you’re looking for T replacement you should do that (with an MD and take HCG too; and microdose the T; most people overdo it.)
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
And also agree that if you’re looking for T replacement you should do that (with an MD and take HCG too; and microdose the T; most people overdo it.)
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
I'm a fan of it. And I think you've done really interesting work about hormone replacement theory. The argument around testosterone and masculinity, I think, is a really important one in the political spectrum because to the far right's credit, they recognize the problem with young men before anybody else. The problem is they conflate masculinity with coarseness and cruelty.