The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
And in fact, if you can take, you know, what we call wild type male mice, if you will, right? meaning they're sort of completely uh typical or normal male mice and you can measure their testosterone levels and you get a huge range of circulating testosterone in otherwise normal mice of you know or five to 10fold difference in testosterone
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
if men are within the typical range even at the low end you don't see a lot you don't see changes in sexual or aggressive behavior within the normal range right you see muscle m you see differences in physical parameters but not