Peter Attia· MD
the position papers that I've been involved with state that because um it's so hard to get the concentrations consistent we recommend using transdermal male products at female doses as opposed to compounding
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the position papers that I've been involved with state that because um it's so hard to get the concentrations consistent we recommend using transdermal male products at female doses as opposed to compounding
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
and if you're going to compound you're probably better off with transdermal than a pellet or an injection because of the Peaks and the difficulty in not getting into the the key thing is you don't want to get into that super physiologic level which hasn't been demonstrated to be safe in women