The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
and there's no cut point for saying this testosterone is the one you don't treat a testosterone you treat a syndrome right that's the first thing you treat hsdd and I usually check Baseline levels to make sure they're not high right
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
and there's no cut point for saying this testosterone is the one you don't treat a testosterone you treat a syndrome right that's the first thing you treat hsdd and I usually check Baseline levels to make sure they're not high right like because if someone comes to me and they're 52 and their testosterone's surprisingly high for their they're not in that later cortile I might say to them I don't think this is the solution to your problem right but if it's low as I expect it to be it's not they're not abnormal they're