The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Testosterone replacement therapy technically means that someone's levels prior to that therapy fall outside the reference range so low lower than 300 nanograms per deciliter typically or some other array of symptoms at and they replace it replacement therapy
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
The problem is is like the definition of symptom relief too is so vague because you could achieve simp symptom relief at you know 450 total t maybe depending on the person or it might be at like 800 or it might have been like even if it was 450 like if you got up to 800 you're still in normal on paper so like is that bad you know who's to say yeah I think most people would say it's the high of normal because that's literally what it is on a reference range so it all is going to be just being cognizant of the fact that androgens will do what androgens do which is they will in a dose dependent manner drive ariththropoesis.