Peter Attia· MD
one of the practitioners that promotes 200 to 300 total test in females which is like insane
Loading…
We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
one of the practitioners that promotes 200 to 300 total test in females which is like insane
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the question is to what now I've never heard a compelling case for why it should be replaced to a level that exceeds her physiologic limit in her 30s for example • and I've never seen a woman in her 30s with a total testosterone between 2 and 300 Mill nanog per deciliter in other words those levels exceed even her peak physiologic level so it doesn't surprise me that that would be androgenized women
I've seen standards being promoted as cookie cutter everyone should have a 200 nanogram per T ler total test wow which is crazy very high yeah
And like I had one doctor even when I was like first getting into this industry who's like really respected. I'm not going to necessarily put him on blast cuz hopefully he's kind of fixed his protocols, but he had a cookie cutter protocol that was like way too aggressive and like I could uh he had my mom on the protocol.