The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so if I understand correctly the slope of the line of one's uh testosterone increase for both boys and girls is predictive of striving if it's a steep upward you know yeah line then then that that's associated with more striving in a given practice to the extent that like neural activation during a social reward task or a risk taking task is a proxy for striving and and that's what that's what a lot of people have argued yeah
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.