Andrew Huberman· PhD
I think we have pretty convincing data that that's not the case you know there's lots of longitudinal data spanning decades where if man it's given testosterone um it doesn't change its risk
Loading…
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
I think we have pretty convincing data that that's not the case you know there's lots of longitudinal data spanning decades where if man it's given testosterone um it doesn't change its risk
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
there's been some recent studies suggesting that giving testosterone to men after radical prostectomy may be potentially protective against biochemical occurrence
there's no data to support that it causes cancer
but there's no data to support that it causes cancer
there's been some recent studies suggesting that giving testosterone to men after radical prostatectomy may be potentially protective against biochemical occurrence that was Tom Allen's group
the American Urologic Association in 2018 came out with the testosterone guidelines guideline on that under Section patients should be informed there's no association between testosterone and prostate cancer strong recommendation