Rhonda Patrick· PhD
But, you know, both of those hormones are pro-anabolic and therefore pro-cancer hormones. Chronic elevations of those hormones mess with a lot of systems that we just...we're only beginning to understand.
Loading…
We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
But, you know, both of those hormones are pro-anabolic and therefore pro-cancer hormones. Chronic elevations of those hormones mess with a lot of systems that we just...we're only beginning to understand.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
So, excessive testosterone or high levels, great driver of prostate growth, excessive growth hormone, a great driver of lots of different tissues.