David Sinclair· PhD
And if you're already predisposed to prostate cancer, you have cancerous growth already. This could actually aggravate the tumors.
Loading…
We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
And if you're already predisposed to prostate cancer, you have cancerous growth already. This could actually aggravate the tumors.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
if I have prostate cancer either castrate me or put me in the normal range but do not I think personally put me in the hypogonal range I think it's a danger zone