The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Now if we take firefighters who are beginning with high blood pressure then we saw a significant reduction in that systolic as well as diastolic blood pressure and the change in blood pressure of course we don't claim that in the manuscript but when we talk about it some physician would get up and say wow that looks like almost there on a blood pressure lowering drug so the extent of blood pressure lowering is equivalent to somebody taking a antihypertensive drug
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
In fact, if you do early timerestricted eating and stop eating, you know, I don't know how early in the day it was, maybe 6 p.m., maybe it was 8:00 p.m., but you know, there was like a blood pressure drop that was like 10, you know, 10, I think was um >> uh points or something millimeters of mercury.
So, I mean, that's very significant. It's on it's on magnitude of what you'd see with like some of the firstline, you know, drugs that are used to treat hypertension.