Andrew Huberman· PhD
So what I would say is like some of the more milder forms of time-restricted eating appear to be fine for lean body mass
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
So what I would say is like some of the more milder forms of time-restricted eating appear to be fine for lean body mass
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
then I would say, well, you're not really gaining a whole lot by doing some form of time-restricted eating.
If you're going to do a 4/20, I would say you're then going to be in a lot more...and there's been research, one study certainly showed diminished muscle hypertrophy with a 4/20 versus a traditional eating pattern.
for the vast majority of people, when you're not looking to body build, it's just not going to be much of a difference.