The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
at first I was like oh we got to be really cautious with this same thinking like I don't want people to lose too much weight like this is a problem are they going to be dependent I like the notion that you have to take something the rest of your life and I'm not saying it has to be the rest of your life but when something works and as far as I can tell it's very safe I think I think it's worth discussing and I I like people having those options at least
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.