Andrew Huberman· PhD
they did not see a difference in the between the medium and the High group but they did in the output of the thalamus
Verbal pushback — no audited source on record.
88
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
they did not see a difference in the between the medium and the High group but they did in the output of the thalamus
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
figure three talks about their belief about nicotine strength did not modulate the reward response the dopamine response
they did not see a difference in the between the medium and the High group but they did in the output of the thalamus I was also surprised that they didn't see a difference this is kind of interesting in its own right if figure three talks about their belief about nicotine strength did not modulate the reward response the dopamine response