The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Type 1 diabetes and the disease type 2 diabetes share the same name in diabetes because I do think for many people they just sort of – think someone has diabetes, but the nomenclature of one versus two is profound. They are really different diseases. Very different, completely different. They almost have nothing in common except for high glucose as a potential consequence.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.