The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
there's one study that doin her colleagues did where they stimulate chronic stress by increasing corticosterone but cortisol and they found that subjects would in increase their consumption of sugar and fat in fact they would even eat lard and that led to all sorts of things like type 2 diabetes um that led to dysfunction in the adrenal output Etc
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.