The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
he lost 30-something pounds he said I used to be very heavy and I was type two diabetic full-blown for quite some time but he said Iver you know how long it took me to become non diabetic by glucose measures and I said oh you're gonna tell me like couple of weeks ten days i retested I was right down and then he was like ten days he was technically non-diabetic by blood glucose measures after years of type 2 diabetes
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.