The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
in some ways the tragedy of using hemoglobin a1c as the marker of when somebody gets on the radar i mean you said it yourself patients will show up and nobody's ringing the bell until their hemoglobin a1c is above 6.5 but i mean that literally is happening 10 15 maybe 20 years after there were early early molecular warning signs
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.