The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
when men come in for infertility evaluations a lot of time we do diagnose you know these new medical problems sometimes we diagnose cancer you know sort of alluding to some of the questions you've asked diabetes and some other you know very significant genetic conditions as well and you know the first way that we would identify it is reproductive failure because their sperm counts are low
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.