The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
and we're again some of the same damage that occurs especially when in diabetes again some new blood vessels are growing or blood vessels are leaky some of that can be treated with used to be lasers and now more commonly is often being treated with some of the same injectable drugs that are treating macular degeneration um but there's still a lot lot of vision loss with diabetes and diabetic retinopathy
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
there are drugs that can be injected if your retina is getting you know kind of leaky blood vessels from diabetes uh there there are treatments that we can give the eye specifically to try to counter the diabetic retinopathy