Paul Saladino· MD
And typically, if you're below 100, that is considered normal, non-diabetic thresholds, where 100 to 126 would be considered pre-diabetic, and then above 126 would be diabetes.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
And typically, if you're below 100, that is considered normal, non-diabetic thresholds, where 100 to 126 would be considered pre-diabetic, and then above 126 would be diabetes.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
so most people who have had a blood test would recognize that a fasting blood glucose of 100 Mig per deiler is sort of right on the cusp of being just just starting to get to be too high