The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
let's just talk about The Singletons the non yes is 16.86 so 16.86 people die and some people probably think how can 0.86 of a person die well it's not always whole numbers but um there's a there's a bad joke to be made here but yeah just call it 17 versus 25 right 17 deaths per thousand versus 25 deaths yep
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
so the first thing that just jumps out at you I think when you look at this is there's clearly a difference here between the people who have diabetes and those who don't