The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
If you if you have a a drug that uh that that that treats your disease well, um you know, congestive heart failure and now you have a drug that that that that allows you to live longer, more health, you know, in a way that allows you to live more fully or or uh if you have uh you know, diabetes and you you slow the progress of the disease so it doesn't result in your kidneys failing, your your going blind or whatnot.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.