We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
vaping might be better for you than smoking but it's still terrible for your lungs I I'm The Vaping Community hates me because they want me to say it's not carcinogenic but the data show that it can cause popcorn lung I mean it's just not good
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
but the whole popcorn lung thing is clearly problematic