The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I have seen studies that suggest that the absorption of vitamin A from real liver is very different than supplements I would never I would never supplement a patient with vitamin A palmitate in the supplement never do that I would just get the vitamin A from liver and I think when you do that it's totally safe and it's really really hard to get too much vitamin A
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
I don't think it's a real thing actually I think that the toxicity with vitamin A is only in the supplements again going back to supplements and the idea that we can't be reductionist
i don't think you should be taking retinol palmitate because as i mentioned earlier there are so many other important occurring co-factors in liver that you'll benefit from why not just eat liver