The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
It's particularly important for people who are on specialized diets, say, if you're a vegan or a vegetarian, you're going to be lacking in vitamin B12, probably, you may have low NAD levels, because you're getting older, you measure those, and then you'll have recommendations to supplement and bring those levels back to an optimal level.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.