Paul Saladino· MD
if you have a level of vitamin C which is too low and when I would say too low it as it turns out and it will become clear from this discussion that too low is a lot lower than what the RDI will tell you
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
if you have a level of vitamin C which is too low and when I would say too low it as it turns out and it will become clear from this discussion that too low is a lot lower than what the RDI will tell you
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
there's studies from conscious objectors from 1940 that say ten milligrams of vitamin C a day is enough to prevent scurvy
what we know with people in a carnivore community is that moderate amounts of vitamin C appear to be able to convince scurvy just fine
now the question then becomes is more vitamin C than is needed to prevent scurvy beneficial for humans from an antioxidant perspective vitamin C does a number of things in the human body the most commonly referenced one is regeneration of glutathione at the aqueous layer of the cell membrane and there are a number of things that can do that so we don't know how much vitamin C is needed to regenerate regenerate glutathione or regenerate vitamin e in the membrane but if you look at the literature it a lot of it is done in people who are diabetic or insulin resistant and they might be able to show that 70 milligrams of vitamin C is better than 30 milligrams of vitamin C but I referenced the study earlier today in which you know an improvement in the noël not an improvement but a change in the diet that led to an increase in vitamin C from 7-0 to 270 milligrams of vitamin C despite increasing blood levels of vitamin C 30% led to no changes in markers of oxidative stress DNA damage or inflammation