The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
there have been two age related eye disease studies called AIDS age related eye disease studies arids there was arids and then arids too and those studies were large randomized Trials of using giving giving patients supplements and in arids it was vitamin c and e higher dose than would just come in a multivitamin zinc and copper and then also beta carotene
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
and and they actually found head-to-head that the second the AIDS 2 formula without the beta carotene and with the ltin and xanthine that that formula was even better at slowing dry macular degeneration in the moderate to severe population