We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
I'm just not convinced there's really good evidence that anything above maybe 30 to 70 milligrams a day which is easily obtainable from animal foods it's optimal for a human as James and I talked about potentially more especially in the form of supplements might even be dangerous
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
I'm far from convinced that the mega doses of vitamin C are beneficial we know that doses as low as 10 milligrams will cure scurvy and if we look at interventional studies it's not incredibly convincing that doses beyond 50 to 70 milligrams really change much in the way of oxidative stress markers