We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
so this gets into this really kind of counterculture notion like are we really using vitamin C as an antioxidant as much as people think we are this is the Linus Pauling theory that mega doses of vitamin C are good for us which I would argue very strongly with
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
I think it was Paul Polling that believed that vitamin C was the answer to everything and he won Nobel prizes but he might not have been right about that
though I think in for the most part people today view many of his views with respect to hyper doses of vitamin C is sort of nonsensical