Paul Saladino· MD
in this one study the people increase the amount of vitamin C in their diet from 77 0 milligrams to 270 milligrams and there was no change in DNA damage or markers of oxidative stress
Loading…
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
in this one study the people increase the amount of vitamin C in their diet from 77 0 milligrams to 270 milligrams and there was no change in DNA damage or markers of oxidative stress
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
there are a couple of studies that show that that if you you know interventional e if you increase you know fruits and vegetables and you go from 70 to 270 milligrams of vitamin C in a day there's no real change despite an increase in vitamin C in the blood
it's not incredibly convincing that doses beyond 50 to 70 milligrams really change much in the way of oxidative stress markers
the vitamin c level in the plasma went up 35 and there was no change in the antioxidant capacity