The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
in this one study the people increase the amount of vitamin C in their diet from 77 0 milligrams to 270 milligrams and there was no change in DNA damage or markers of oxidative stress
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
there are a couple of studies that show that that if you you know interventional e if you increase you know fruits and vegetables and you go from 70 to 270 milligrams of vitamin C in a day there's no real change despite an increase in vitamin C in the blood
it's not incredibly convincing that doses beyond 50 to 70 milligrams really change much in the way of oxidative stress markers
the vitamin c level in the plasma went up 35 and there was no change in the antioxidant capacity