Paul Saladino· MD
if what Bart and I are proposing is true there's probably not a whole lot of benefits going much above that
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
if what Bart and I are proposing is true there's probably not a whole lot of benefits going much above that
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the other thing I would say is if people are worried it's not the worst thing in the world to add a little bit of vitamin C supplement though I have not seen clinical evidence that we need it
I think that probably my hypothesis would be that humans need vitamin C but the doses that are easily obtainable eating nose-to-tail that is 50 to 70 milligrams a day are more than adequate to maintain ideal antioxidant status in the human body