The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the metaanalysis of nine randomized control trials showing a small but significant Improvement in the outcomes for colds and flu or reduction in probability of getting colds and flu that study was retracted and it was retracted on the basis of multiple instances of an error in which the placebo groups had been double counted in Trials more than the two intervention arms so there were some serious data analysis flaws in that metaanalysis
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.