Paul Saladino· MD
so to me optimal blood levels are above 70 and that's where the lowest risk of numerous diseases are
Loading…
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
so to me optimal blood levels are above 70 and that's where the lowest risk of numerous diseases are
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
a meta-analysis of 14 studies comprising more than 6,000 lung cancer cases found that vitamin C was not only protective but also showed a dose-dependent effect for every 100 milligram increase in daily vitamin C intake among men the risk of developing lung cancer decreased 7%
the people with the highest blood vitamin C concentrations were 15 percent less likely to develop respiratory conditions and were 46 percent less likely to die of lung cancer compared to those with the lowest blood vitamin C levels
The people with the highest blood vitamin C concentrations were 15 percent less likely to develop respiratory conditions and were 46 percent less likely to die of lung cancer compared to those with the lowest blood vitamin C levels